Powered By IdeaScale
Login / Signup

Questions for Speaker Pelosi

Netroots Nation 2008
« Back To Questions for Speaker Pelosi

victoria2dc

User Profile Image victoria2dc
Member since : Jul-09-2008 (New)
1 Ideas, 8 Comments, 21 Votes

User Activity Stream

Ideas Posted

By not following your oath of office and by not being forthright with the members of the Democratic base, you've opened yourself up to becoming the cause for Barack Obama to lose this election.

Because we can't understand why this president is still in office when he should have been impeached for serious crimes, there are currently strong suspicions that you too are guilty of committing and covering-up crimes against the nation. There are new accusations that you are interfering with the House Judiciary Committee's decision to enact inherent contempt charges against Karl Rove, Josh Bolton and Harriet Miers. What are you saying to Henry Waxman? I'd like to hear the truth from you.
Displaying 1 - 25 of 357 Ideas
12345678910….1415Next »

Comments Posted

victoria2dc 1 year ago
Wrong comment for her. She does process, not policy... and healthcare is definitely process. Don't waste your time thinking that you'll bet anytihng from her on this. Ha!
victoria2dc 1 year ago
Do you honestly think that the Speaker cares? I called the HJC today to find out the status concerning Rove. They said that the chairman hadn't made any announcements as of this afternoon. I asked it it's true that the Speaker is pressuring the Chaiman not to proceed with inherent contempt. I won't discuss the response.
victoria2dc 1 year ago
The approval rating for this 110th Congress is so bad because of the decisions made by the Democratic Party leadership (Pelosi/Hoyer/Reid). It's too bad because there are some brilliant and hard working members of the House and a few in the Senate who all look like failures because of the decisions made by the members of the Democratic Party leadership.
victoria2dc 1 year ago
You say: "...why don't you move forward with the only option remaining -- appointing a Special Prosecutor with wide-ranging ability to uncover the truth?"

I don't think you understand that she has spent the last 2 years attempting to make sure that the crimes of the Bush administration are covered.

Because she's let it go so far, the only remedy now is impeachment hearings. But she took it off the table, didn't she? She did but the only remaining tool is impeachment because Bush/Cheney cannot stonewall, cover-up, hold documents or deny Congress whatever they ask for because impeachment investigations/hearings trump executive privilege and the Bush (Addington/Yoo) concept of the unitary executive.

Alls she needs to do is give Chairman Conyers the go ahead and he'll do the rest. However, let me repeat: she is not looking for the truith.
victoria2dc 1 year ago
That's why we have c-span and oversight hearings take place live. Webcasts of all oversight hearings are available on the committee's website. Congress is still 20 years behind the rest of us. They still don't know how to recover the e-mails that the Bush administration destroyed and the hard drives they smashed to avoid criminal charges. Do you really think that Congress could manage such an every day event? Hardly!!
victoria2dc 1 year ago
I am so angry at what this woman has done to our country. I had hoped that she would have been a bright light when she was elected Speaker; instead she has done more damage to this country in less than 2 years than Bush did in 8. Shame, shame.
victoria2dc 1 year ago
Don't give her policy questions... she's a process person and doesn't create policy.
victoria2dc 1 year ago
It's another Pelosi fiasco. Here's what she's saying about it: The legislation, H.Con.Res.362, which is paralleled by a similar Senate bill, has gained bipartisan support rapidly, with more co-sponsors signing on by the day. Once it hits the floor, it's bound to "pass like a hot knife through butter," a staffer in House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's office told Chelsea Mozen of the nonprofit Just Foreign Policy.

Well isn't that exciting? We give the president the power to spy legally and then she could decide to rush through a resolution which could lead to war with Iran, gives a wink to the 7,000 members of AIPAC who lobbied Congress recently. My, my... isn't life in the Speaker's office full of excitement?