In Collusion With War Criminals?

Posted by jar2 07/07/2008 12:00 AM PDT

Why, Madam speaker, did you, immediately after taking your post as the most powerful woman politician in American history, and after Democrats won back power on promises of holding the criminal and illegitimate regime of George Bush to account, as your first order of business decide to protect a group of power hungry madmen and a president who has committed so many crimes that even those of us following atentively have a hard time keeping track. Crimes ranging from treason to mass murder, from torture to violations of the Geneva Conventions, from upsurping the US Government to thousands of violations of the US Constitution, crimes so sgregious and numerous that the head spins. Is your refusal to hold the monster now occupying the White House accountable because, as one version would have it put forth by a renown Constitutional Law professor, you yourself would then also be open to prosecution for enabling such tantamount crimes and your collusion would also leave you vulnerable to prosecution??? My previous question as to why your office would not help me, a native American, when my citizenship was taken away by the Bushies for being critical has not been popular here and I am sure that I must throw you a softball to get you to answer, but ask my question I must, it is my duty as a member of the human race.